Swampland, TIME

Disappointing Column

David Brooks has been on a roll lately, column after column filled with smart, independent thinking. Not today. Using the guise of "realism," Brooks essentially sings from the neoconservative hymnal on the problems the next President will face in dealing with Iran. Now, no one thinks this will be easy--for the reasons I described in my print column last week. But it is not impossible. Indeed, there was real cooperation between the U.S. and Iran when it came to removing the Taliban from power in 2001. Iran was, by all accounts, a positive force in the "six plus two" process that involved Afghanistan's neighbors in the post-Taliban stabilization of that country. The Mullahs became somewhat less congenial after Bush identified them as part of his foolishly bombastic "Axis of Evil" in early 2002. But even then, there was a real opportunity for negotiations in the Spring of 2003, when the Iranians reached out and requested that negotiations begin (in large part because they were daunted by the astonishing U.S. military success in taking Baghdad).

Brooks says that the Iranian regime faces the choice of acting as a revolutionary jihadist power or a regional hegemonist power, but there's no difference between those two "options" and that's not the real choice here. The real choice is between being regional hegemonist power--running Hizballah in Lebanon, arming Hamas, covertly using its influence to control Iraq--and becoming a normal country, part of the international fabric of nations, which is what the Iranian people overwhelmingly want. The question is, how does the next President encourage Iran to choose the latter course? By threats and bluster, and the insistence on regime change--Bush's way--or through a more nuanced, respectful posture, that includes carrots and sticks?

One way to get Iran to think twice about hegemony is to peel Syria away from its close, and uncomfortable--if you talk to Syrian officials--alliance with Iran. Brooks is just wrong about this:

You’ll spend hours, as the Bush administration has, wondering whether Syria’s Bashar al-Assad can be turned in a more Western direction. Nobody can make an educated guess about that because no outsider understands Assad’s mind.

The real why the Administration is "wondering" so much is that it foolishly decided to stop talking to Assad after the assassination of Rafiq Hariri in early 2006. As one prominent Republican foreign policy expert told me, "It's the stupidest [flaming] thing I've ever seen in American diplomacy." Assad has sent signals far and wide, to all comers--including me, in a 2005 interview--that he wants to rejoin the community of nations.

In the 2006 war between Israel and Hizballah, Syria sent several positive signs--first, it lifted all visa requirements for U.S. citizens trapped in Lebanon. Then, it contacted the State Department and offered to provide a motorcade of buses to evacuate U.S. citizens from Beirut and bring them to Damascus--a two-hour ride. There was no State Department response (indeed, the State Department never responded to my inquiries about this Syrian initiative). "Do you people really think that we want to be this close to the Iranians?" A prominent Syrian official asked me at the time. "We're trying to send you a signal."

The Bush Administration has been stone blind to signals from those the President, an international infant, considers to be bad guys. In fact, it is impossible to say just what sort of situation the next President will face until the Bush cancer is excised from the White House and a new team begins to explore the middle east for the diplomatic possibilities that may well have been ignored, quashed and generally stomped on by this sad, overmatched Administration.

| Sphere Related Blogs & Articles |

Reader Comments (36)

Terrapinion:

David Brooks is a duplicitous concern troll.

The reason that he is so effective in altering people's minds is that he is such a flinchy nebbish that nobody perceives him to be a threat.

Olufemi:

In fact, it is impossible to say just what sort of situation the next President will face until the Bush cancer is excised from the White House and a new team begins to explore the middle east for the diplomatic possibilities that may well have been ignored, quashed and generally stomped on by this sad, overmatched Administration.

Well said, Joe.

Joe Klein's guilty conscience Author Profile Page:

Joe:
Why don't you point out that John McBush wants to continue these boneheaded policies?

TomT:

I think Brooks is generally awful, but he actually has had some good columns recently. The thing is this: I suspect the good columns are just a set-up for him to go whacko (as he does here). I really think that the guy's a clown at the end of the day.

Thanks for calling him out on this nonsense, Joe. You're correct.

Joe Klein's guilty conscience Author Profile Page:

Joe:
How about calling John McBush out for his use of Petraeus in a campaign fund raising flyer?

Cliff:

"until the Bush cancer is excised from the White House"

Thank you.

Paul Dirks Author Profile Page:

It would be less 'disappointing' if you had a more realistic assessment of David Brooks in the first place. I know that the two of you are often attacked from the same quarters ( and occasionally for similar reasons) so you're more likely to be sympathetic than we DFH's but Brooks does have a reather long record of hackery....

http://select.nytimes.com/2007/07/17/opinion/17brooks.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

http://www.progressive.org/blogressive_brooks102306

Casey Morris:

As one prominent Republican foreign policy expert told me, "It's the stupidest [flaming] thing I've ever seen in American diplomacy."

James Baker speaks!

Acid J:

On a roll? You're out of your mind. THe last two Brooks columns I read were about how science-v.-atheism is really buddhism v. the bible, and another one about how a Democratic presidential administration would be a crazy circus while a Republican administration would be nobly entrenched.

I'm sure the rest of your post was perfectly reasonable, though.

QUESTION HILLARY Author Profile Page:

YES JOE, THOSE ARMOR PIERCING MOLTEN SLUGS THEIR TOWELED AGENTS is AIMING AT OUR TROOPS PROVE THEIR ETERNAL NEIGHBORLY GOODNESS.

NICE REPORTING.

= ARAFAT ACCOMPLISHED =

Elvis Elvisberg Author Profile Page:

Great post, Joe. Realism, emerging from diplomats, involves refraining from conflict when it's not necessary. Neoconservatism, emerging from rhetoricians and pundits, means posing false dilemmas to maximize the possibility of war.

Brooks: This is the problem with multipolarity. When everybody is responsible, nobody is responsible.

Disgusting. When the putative sole superpower lapses into a jihad to remake the globe in its image, the rest of the world becomes more receptive to multipolarity. We arranged an international coalition against Saddam in 1991, and very effective sanctions against Libya in the 1980s. We can do it, if our cause is just and we stop acting to convince the world that we're insane.

So now that our policy of treating everyone as a possible invasion target makes the world suspicious of us, Brooks says we have to blame the weak-kneed, lily-livered "feckless international community" for the problems in Iran. Charming. And "Iran will still be on the march"? What does that even refer to? What is that except the same fear-based rhetoric that we saw in the run-up to the Iraq invasion?

Joe: The real choice is between being regional hegemonist power--running Hizballah in Lebanon, arming Hamas, covertly using its influence to control Iraq--and becoming a normal country, part of the international fabric of nations

Not to be a jerk, or anything, but is that really a choice? We seem to be able to do both just fine, thank you very much. Is it just that we're powerful enough, so everyone else can just Suck. On. This?

Note, by the way, that the Bush administration shares Saddam Hussein's approach to diplomacy.

"How should we solve our problems with Iran? Iran took our lands. They are controlling the Shatt-al-Arab, our big river. How can meetings and discussions solve a problem like this? Do you know why they decided to meet with us here, Salah? They are weak is why they are talking with us. If they were strong there would be no need to talk. So this gives us an opportunity, an opportunity that only comes along once in a century. We have an opportunity here to recapture our territories and regain control of our river."

That was when al-Ali realized that Saddam had just been playing with the Iranians, and that Iraq was going to go to war. Saddam had no interest in diplomacy. To him, statecraft was just a game whose object was to outmaneuver one's enemies.
Todd and in Charge:

Brooks manages to boil every issue down -- no matter the topic, no matter its complexity -- to a reductionist choice between two binary approaches, neither one grounded in reality but instead mere constructs in BoBo's mind.

It's amazing, really, if you go back and review his columns how he always finds that there are two choices or approaches to pick from.

QUESTION HILLARY Author Profile Page:

BTW: One way to get their attention IS to finally issue The Ultimatum (stand down, or get rocked) -- and then ACT on it when they whine to the UN ala Saddam.

Enough coddling terrorist sponsors, or Putin puppets, or Berzerkley babes, in any venue.

= LIVE FREE OR KLEIN =

QUESTION HILLARY Author Profile Page:

All We IS Saying, Give Jihad A Chance...

QUESTION HILLARY Author Profile Page:

Jihad Joe Klein, Barack Chamberlite.

Barack Chamberpot, Jenius Joke Kline.

Terrapinion:

Joe Klein - I await your response to the conservative representative on this comment thread, QuestionHillary.

Seriously.

QUESTION HILLARY Author Profile Page:

DENVER 2008 SNEAK RETREAT PEAK...

! WE HAVE JUST BEGUN TO SCURRY !

! GIVE ME YOUR TENS, YOUR TWENTIES, YOUR FIFTIES !

! HEY HEY YOUSEF YOUSEF GET OFFA MY GOAT !

! THAT'S ONE SMALL SLUT FOR HEMP, ONE GIANT SLUT FOR TED KENNEDY !

! ASK NOT WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR PRECINCT CAPTAIN, ASK WHAT THE BIG DIG UNION SLACKER BOONDOGGLE DID FOR JOHN KERRY'S NEXT SPOUSAL UNIT !

! THAT'S ONE FOR THE MONEY, TWO FOR THE MONEY, THREE FOR THE MONEY, AND FOUR FRESH HOOKERS TO BLOZO !

! CAN'T WE ALL JUST WHINE ALONG?

! THE PELOSI PEACE DIVIDEND MEANS SYRIA LOVES YOU, MARY JO !

! JUST IGNORE THE EFP'S FROM IRAN, THEY ONLY KILL DUMB GRUNTS THAT DON'T VOTE DEMOCRAP -- NOW WHERE DID I PARK WIFIE'S NEW SUV, ER, MY ECO-PINTO?

! 2 AMERICAS, 3 AMERICAS, 4 AMERICAS -- AFTER A WHILE, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT YUGOSLOBIA !

! PLEASE JOIN REVEREND WRONG IN THE SINGING OF OUR BELGIAN NATIONAL ANTHEM !

! SLAVES AT LAST, SLAVES AT LAST, THANK OBAMA ALMIGHTY, THE WORLD'S ALL SLAVES AT LAST !

! YO. DUDE. YOU'RE HITTING ON MY SISTER'S ABORTIONIST !

! AFTER THE QUADRENNIAL SPITTING OF THE TROOPS, WE WILL FORMALLY COMMENCE WITH THE BAITING OF THE BOY SCOUTS ABOUT CHRIST, FOLLOWED BY THE GROUP NAP UNDER ABBIE HOFFMAN'S LEVITATED LARD OF A LEGACY -- SPONSORED IN PART BY YOUR BLUES STATE RIFLE ASSOCIATION, BIPOLAR BRIGADE, RICHARD BELZER CHAPTER !

! DOUCHE, WHERE'S MY DURBIN?

! APPEASEMENT ACCOMPLISHED !

johnr:

See, this is one of the problems that I have. I just don't understand how anybody could ever take David Brooks seriously. Of Bill Kristol. Or Thomas Friedman. Or MoDo. Or...

QUESTION HILLARY Author Profile Page:

Seriously, IS Denver or Minneapolis first this go-round?

I want to be sure to get the APPEASEMENT ACCOMPLISHED sign up in Time for Klein's entrance to the portable Trader Vic's in the Kennedy Memorial Lush Lounge next to the SCUBA rental cart along side the golf iron range nearby the Oldsmobile dealership...

Florida:

Brooks and QH aren't the only ones proving they're clueless of late. Here's John McCain demonstrating again that he has no idea what he's talking about.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/29/mccain-declares-mosul-qui_n_104208.html

ivb:

The Bush Administration has been stone blind to signals from those the President, an international infant, considers to be bad guys. In fact, it is impossible to say just what sort of situation the next President will face until the Bush cancer is excised from the White House and a new team begins to explore the middle east for the diplomatic possibilities that may well have been ignored, quashed and generally stomped on by this sad, overmatched Administration.

I've been meaning to post the reminder about this very early failure of the Bush Administration for several posts now. It still infuriates me that they ignored this overture.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/002528.php

Through a Swiss intermediary, the Iranian regime proposed the basis for comprehensive discussions. If accepted, it would have meant the Iranians would have put on the table ending its support for Palestinian terrorist groups; "action" on transforming Hezbollah into a "mere political organization within Lebanon"; "transparency" that Iran isn't trying to develop WMD; and "enhanced action against Al Qaida members in Iran."

Everything in the proposal isn't a good idea, but it was certainly a starting point for diplomacy. In 2003!

JRVJ:

Joe,

I just went after you in re: the Aylers blog entry, but I have to admit that this entry is much better.

The thing is, if you think is an international infant and that Bush is a cancer, you can't let up!!!

Mr. Nice Guy:

Hey, QH, I appreciate the ALL CAPS you use in your posts. When I see that, I know to skip over whatever it is that follows.

QH: WILLFUL SELF-DELUSION ACCOMPLISHED

I will say this for Say Joe: He's no Scottie McClunkhead.

McClunkhead, like so many passed over former flag ocifers and secondary staffers and Dan Rathers that don't raise a decent qualm until their retiree checks are firmly in hand, could never be the likes of Say Joe.

Say Joe was all about staying out of Iraq, no matter the threat seen or unseen, or Saddam's bloody track record, or the UN's oil-for-Scotland scam, or North Korean SCUD supplies, or Oosay & Koosay in Talibanland, or rape rooms, or kiddie jails, or wood chippers, or aspirin factories in Sudan...

Sorry, what was that?

He wasn't there either?

My bad.

Never mind.

Paul Daniel Ash Author Profile Page:

In psychiatry, thought disorder or formal thought disorder is a term used to describe a pattern of disordered language use that is presumed to reflect disordered thinking. It is usually considered a symptom of psychotic mental illness, although it occasionally appears in other conditions.

It describes a persistent underlying disturbance to conscious thought and is classified largely by its effects on speech and writing. Affected persons may show pressure of speech (speaking incessantly and quickly), derailment or flight of ideas (switching topic mid-sentence or inappropriately), thought blocking, rhyming, punning, or 'word salad' when individual words may be intact but speech is incoherent.

stuart_zechman:

Posted by Joe Klein May 30, 2008 10:05:

David Brooks has been on a roll lately, column after column filled with smart, independent thinking.

Joe:

Surely you can help a poor reader out, and provide links (as you did with today's column) to exactly which "column after column" were written by Brooks, and yet somehow also not representative of the morbid hackery that generally characterizes elite columnists.

That said, I really do appreciate you looking into what appears to be one of Brooks' more pathological and degenerate pieces of political rot. You've shown me up to be quite mistaken when I wrote

Joe won't throw down like this in response to Davids Brooks or Ignatius, or Michael O'Hanlon, or Tom "Friedman Unit" Friedman, or anybody who is far more dangerous than the Plame-discredited Bob Novak, even though they endlessly make identically preposterous, ideology/privilege driven, reality-challenged arguments the bedrock of Beltway establishment foreign policy encyclicals.

I was wrong.

When I remarked "Let's see him take on the current arguments of his sophisticated colleagues, instead of the old, execrable Novak.", it did not seem to me that you were willing to tell truths such as

...there was real cooperation between the U.S. and Iran when it came to removing the Taliban from power in 2001. Iran was, by all accounts, a positive force in the "six plus two" process that involved Afghanistan's neighbors in the post-Taliban stabilization of that country.

, in the face of Brooks' dishonest appeasement accusations:

Obama Admires Bush, May 16, 2008, David Brooks

Barack Obama issued a statement...he declared,


“It’s time to engage in diplomatic efforts to help build a new Lebanese consensus that focuses on electoral reform, an end to the current corrupt patronage system, and the development of the economy that provides for a fair distribution of services, opportunities and employment.”

That sentence has the whiff of what President Bush described yesterday as appeasement. Is Obama naïve enough to think that an extremist ideological organization like Hezbollah can be mollified with a less corrupt patronage system and some electoral reform?

If Obama believes all this, he’s not just a Jimmy Carter-style liberal. He’s off in Noam Chomskyland.

[Obama] reaffirmed that Hezbollah is “not a legitimate political party.” Instead, “It’s a destabilizing organization by any common-sense standard. This wouldn’t happen without the support of Iran and Syria.”

Obama being Obama, he understood the broader reason I was asking about Lebanon. Everybody knows that Obama is smart (and he was quite well informed about Lebanon). The question is whether he’s seasoned and tough enough to deal with implacable enemies.

You will perhaps forgive me, Joe, as I am mildly shocked at your willingness to be associated with the likes of Carter and Chomsky (Mao and Stalin are not far off from inclusion in Brooks' next list), by describing Iran in factual terms so removed from the "seasoned" and "tough" phrase "implacable enemies". To my discredit, I did not expect enough courage on your part to withstand the threat of that sort of innuendo and smear being attached to your professional name.

In my criticism of your post last week, I wrote the following:

When Joe starts to argue with Brooks and Ignatius, when he starts to peel away the veneer of "sensibility" and "practicality" and "realism" --when he admits that Brooks and company are responsible for rank deceit in the service of partisanship and ideology demonstrated by pieces in which "Chicken Littles like Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd were ranting that Iraq is another Vietnam"-- then I'll take his renunciation of the essentially Republican ideology that makes up the Village consensus on what's "Serious" at face value.

Today you write

Brooks says that the Iranian regime faces the choice of acting as a revolutionary jihadist power or a regional hegemonist power, but there's no difference between those two "options" and that's not the real choice here. The real choice is between being regional hegemonist power--running Hizballah in Lebanon, arming Hamas, covertly using its influence to control Iraq--and becoming a normal country, part of the international fabric of nations, which is what the Iranian people overwhelmingly want.

, and there is no other conclusion that can be drawn other than that you must be mindful of the desperate need we as a country have for honest debate about our foreign policy options going forward, and that you are doing your part to ground consensus in reality.

Regardless of whatever disagreements we share, or criticism of your views or work I may reserve, the integrity you've demonstrated today is impressive (in terms of mainstream journalism).

Thank you for contributing to the "reality-based community", Joe.

BMB:

Obamaish- I'm glad you wrote that last comment, it brings up something that I'd like to talk about. The argument: "the Iraq invasion was justified because SH was such a bad guy", is incredibly weak and, rightly, smells of desperation. Of course he was a bad guy. But how many soldiers lives is it worth to replace him? How many trillions of dollars? As he was an oppressive tyrant, why is it OK to risk the lives of hundreds-of-thousands of the very citizens he victimized? Why didn't we leave after he was gone? Should we "police" the rest of the world? If so, how soon before we invade China, Russia... (choose your favorite dozen oppressive govts to complete the list)? What about a government that sanctions torture, spies on its own people, refuses to engage much of the world in diplomatic relations, manipulates its media and engages in preemptive military campaigns against weaker, innocent countries? (oh, oops, scratch that last one)

ivb:

QH, I usually read right by your posts, esp the all caps ones, but your question hit my eye and I didn't see a response.

Denver is first this time.

JoyousMN2:

You're right Mr Nice Guy, QH is very easy to skip over due to the caps. Obamish and Rustydog aren't as considerate, so I just skim until I see a some ad-hominem attack and I know it'll be them when I scroll down.

Paul Daniel Ash Author Profile Page:

I just wanted to point out that, in this case, winning an argument online is exactly like winning the Special Olympics...

chokora fukara:

"...The real choice is between being regional hegemonist power--running Hizballah in Lebanon, arming Hamas, covertly using its influence to control Iraq--and becoming a normal country, part of the international fabric of nations, which is what the Iranian people overwhelmingly want.
Lets see -- with a few wrinkles here and there, would ANY country hate "-running Hizballah in Lebanon, arming Hamas, covertly using its influence to control Iraq-"

"normal country, part of the international fabric of nations"
A nice international fabric with the USA - not Russia or China! - perched at the top as the sole superpower, eh?
Are you, or have you ever been, a student or disciple of Rumsfeld and/or Wolfowitz?

" ..which is what the Iranian people overwhelmingly want..."
Overwhelmingly? Really? Remind us they cannot vote their wants - just as in Cuba, Kenya, Zimbabwe, China, former USSR etc..

Perhaps we cannot expect our reporters and commentators to be disinterested parties or neutral observers.
Then how do we, the people, get to make informed decisions?

sigh!
----McCain Is the Media's Maverick
" .. obsessively and systematically, the cable news talking heads (on all the major networks, not just FOX) routinely refer to John McCain as a "maverick" without any analysis or cynicism as if it is an undeniable fact. Perhaps Chris Matthews is right when he admits that the press just may be McCain's "base". "
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080428/scheer
--------

denisarvay:

Brook's neocon genetics bubble often to the surface.

goldstonesoft:

Easy Way to Cut Large Video Files into Small Clips with Video Cuttervideo cutterFLV Video Cutter3GP Video Cutter Ultra Video Cutter is a powerful video cutting tool. The main function of Ultra Video Cutter is to cut large video files into new video files, and also to join or merge multiple video clips into a large one. AVI Video CutterMP4 Video CutterDVD Video CutterDAT Video CutterVideo Editor
The program supports so many video formats including AVI, Divx, XviD, MPEG, WMV, ASF, RM, MOV, 3GP, MP4 formatsVideo MergerVideo JoinerVideo Splitter

naber:

sohbet
canlı sohbet
sohpet
sesli sohbet
sesli sohbet
sesli sohbet
sesli chat
sesli chat
sesli chat
chat
çet
ek iş
ek gelir
mirc
avşa adası
avşa
avşa adası
avşa
tatil
tatil köyleri
"Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr"
Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr
Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr
"Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr"
"Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr"
Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr
özcan sarıca ile kurtlar vadisi pusu 3.sezon 1.seo yarışması
özcan sarıca ile kurtlar vadisi pusu 3.sezon 1.seo yarışması
aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış
aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış
"adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması"
adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması
adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması
"adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması"
"adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması"
adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması
ıslak mendil
ıslak mendil
kolonyalı mendil
kolonyalı mendil
paketleme
ambalajlama
paket
web tasarım
seo
refreshing towel
perde
tatil
kozmetik
haber
joy türk
radyo
aşk
haber
video
tatil
tekstilkent
yabancı personel çalışma izni
ikamet tezkeresi
teşvik belgesi
yabancılar çalışma izni
danışmanlık
iso 9001
iso 14001
ohsas belgesi
yabancı çalışma izinleri
teşvik belgesi
ilaç ruhsatı
turizm belgesi
kamera
kamera
kamera
kamera
driver
perde
iso 22000 haccp
teşvik belgesi
yabancı personel çalışma izinleri
kapasite raporu
kobi kredisi
yurtiçi nakliye
iso kalite türkiye
iso kalite
haccp belgesi
ohsas belgesi
yabancı sermaye
teşvik kredisi
teşvik kredisi
garanti belgesi
turizm belgesi
teşvik belgesi
yatırım teşvik belgesi
iso 9001 belgesi
göğüs büyütücü kremler
leke giderici kremler
bitkisel cilt bakım ürünleri
leke giderici ürünler
botoks
botox
perde

m7mmad:
العاب - العاب بنات - العاب باربي - العاب اكشن - العاب تلبيس - منتدى - صور - افلام - مسجات - عالم حواء -ازياء - ديكور - دليل - العاب طبخ - hguhf - سيارات - لعبة سونيك - العاب اطفال - الوليد بن طلال - مسرحيات - مصارعة - شات - العاب اطفال - جده - مقاطع دراجات - بيع و شراء - سوزوكي - كرة قدم - اسلاميات - مواضيع - منتديات - هكر - تسلية - زواج - العاب سيارات - مشاهير - العاب اولاد - لعبة ماريو -حركتات - منتديات محمد - فتح المواقع المحجوبة - بروكسي - يوتيوب - كلاش - الجاسوسات - افلام - انشر - العاب g9g - جده بايكرز -افلام كرتون - محمد - جده - دليل لين - عدنان ولينا - العاب بنات - Guide - فنانات -دراجات - العاب دراجات - العاب براتز - بنات  - صور -العاب دراغون بول -رسائل حب -صور سيارات -صور روعه -تحميل افلام - تولين -السعودية - العاب باتمان - ماهر المعيقلي - علي جابر - سعود الشريم - صور اسلامية -علي الحذيفي - محمد المنشاوي - محمود الحصري -العاب ماريو -عبدالله خياط -سعد الغامدي -العاب شمس -قصص الانبياء -سمك القرش -مصارعة بنات -المصارعه -موتو جي بي -ماسنجر - مسنجر -فوتوشوب -تحميل فوتوشوب -العاب البنات -للبنات فقط -العاب للاولاد فقط شبيك لبيك -جرندايزر -سالي -لولو -فارس -كابتن هيما -العاب فلفلة -مرجان -فريندز -دردشة جدهالعاب براتز - توم وجيري - برزن بريك - طرب توب - صور نور - ماسنجر 9 - العاب قص الشعر - فساتين سهرات - مسلسل نور -games -jeddah - صور براتز -طيور الجنه -وسائط  - صور زهور - صور ورود - شات -ماسنجر 9 -صور قلوب - صور حب -صور قلوب متحركه - توبيكات - نك نيمات - تحميل صور - صور اطفال - كاريكاتيرات
lolo Author Profile Page:

wow it's very nice,,,,,,,,,,,

thanks a lot


sitemap


مرسى الحب


مرسى الحب


توبيكات

  • المرسى الاسلامي


  • مـرسى الترحيب بالأعضاء الجدد والتهاني


  • المنتديات العامة


  • مرسى آدم وحواء


  • مرسى الطبخ


  • قسم الفنون التشكيلية والديكور


  • مرسى الفن


  • مرسى أخبار المشاهير


  • المرسى الأدبي


  • منتدى الصور والغرائب


  • منتدى أفلام YOUTUBE


  • مرسى التصميم والصور


  • منتدى الماسنجر وبرامج المحادثه


  • المرسى التقني


  • مرسى الجوال


  • مرسى الترفيه والفرفشه


  • المرسى العلمي


  • المرسى الطبي


  • مرسى السياحة والسفر


  • مرسى الرياضة و وسائل المواصلات


  • Post a comment


    About Swampland

    Ana Marie Cox

    Ana Marie Cox is the founding editor of Wonkette and the author of the novel Dog Days. Read more

    Joe Klein

    Joe Klein is TIME's political columnist and author of six books, most recently Politics Lost. Read more

    Karen Tumulty

    Karen Tumulty is TIME's National Political Correspondent and has also covered the White House and Congress. Read more

    Jay Carney

    Jay Carney is TIME's Washington bureau chief. He has covered the Clinton and Bush 43 White Houses as well as Congress. Read more

    Jay Newton-Small

    Jay Newton-Small has covered the Bush 43 White House and Congress since the DeLay era. Read more

    Michael Scherer

    Michael Scherer is a TIME Washington bureau correspondent covering the 2008 presidential campaign. Read more

    Mike Murphy

    Mike Murphy is a GOP consultant and was a senior strategist for John McCain's 2000 presidential campaign. Read more

     RSS Feed

    AddThis Feed Button

    Daily Email

    Get Swampland in your inbox and never miss a day:
     
    Delivered by   FeedBurner


    CNN Politics

    Get U.S. and global politics 24-7. Politics at CNN has campaign coverage, latest headlines and video, candidates' positions on the issues, fundraising totals, states to watch, delegate counts, election results, news and analysis
    CNN Politics


    The Page

    Mark Halperin and the TIME political team covering the 2008 campaign bring you all the latest breaking news, videos, and best stories from every source, all in one place, expertly culled and edited, 24/7.
    The Page


    White House Photo Blog

    Get an intimate look at the Bush administration and race for 2008 through the eyes of TIME's White House photographers.
    White House Photo Blog


    Ana Marie Cox on the trail

    Keep up with Cox as she posts pictures and tidbits from the campaign trail.
    Flickr
    Twittr


    advertisement

    Swampland Archives

    August 2008
    Choose a day to view events.

    << Previous Months

              1 2
    3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    10 11 12 13 14 15 16
    17 18 19 20 21 22 23
    24 25 26 27 28 29 30
    31