April 16, 2008 12:56
The President, the Pope and the Media
First I read Mike Allen's Politico Playbook, in which Laura Bush's chief of staff revealed that the elaborate reception at the White House for Pope Benedict XVI was “a sign of the President and Mrs. Bush's respect and love and friendship with the Holy Father.”
I cringed.
Then I heard Ed Henry on CNN inform viewers that President Bush and the Pope share "a special bond."
I groaned.
Finally, Henry paraphrased an unnamed White House official explaining why no one could be sure how long the closed-door session between Bush and Benedict would last: "When you're meeting with the Holy Father, a schedule is just a suggestion."
At that point I wanted to gag.
Please. This is silly. According to this morning's USA Today, President Bush has met this pope exactly once -- last June at the Vatican. According to the transcript of yesterday's White House press briefing with Dana Perino, it's quite possible that they've never once spoken on the phone. So from what shared experience springs all that love and affection? How exactly was their special bond developed? And why is it that the leader of the Catholic Church has more sway over the President's schedule than any other head of state? If Bush were Catholic, I'd understand. But he is not.
I have no doubt that Pope Benedict XVI is a wise and decent man and a compelling spiritual leader. He may also become a great temporal leader, like his predecessor. And I think it's an important and wonderful thing when the Pope visits the United States, meets with the President and performs mass in America. It's a big deal.
But hyping the relationship between the President and the Pope is pure political exploitation, a play for the electoral affection of American Catholics. The Pope is no doubt aware of this, but he is blameless in his complicity. The more attention he gets, the more broadly he is able to spread his message.
As Chris Matthews has rightly said, the battle for the Catholic vote in America is really the battle for swing voters. The coming election, like so many before it, could well hinge on how Catholics break -- this time in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado and New Mexico.
Forgive me for being so cynical as to believe that the special bond Bush feels for the Pope springs from the pivotal role Catholics will play in deciding whether his eight years in office are repudiated or validated on Election Day.
About Swampland
Ana Marie Cox is the founding editor of Wonkette and the author of the novel Dog Days. Read more
Joe Klein is TIME's political columnist and author of six books, most recently Politics Lost. Read more
Karen Tumulty is TIME's National Political Correspondent and has also covered the White House and Congress. Read more
Jay Carney is TIME's Washington bureau chief. He has covered the Clinton and Bush 43 White Houses as well as Congress. Read more
Jay Newton-Small has covered the Bush 43 White House and Congress since the DeLay era. Read more
Michael Scherer is a TIME Washington bureau correspondent covering the 2008 presidential campaign. Read more
RSS Feed
Daily Email
CNN Politics
Get U.S. and global politics 24-7. Politics at CNN has campaign coverage, latest headlines and video, candidates' positions on the issues, fundraising totals, states to watch, delegate counts, election results, news and analysis
CNN Politics
The Page
Mark Halperin and the TIME political team covering the 2008 campaign bring you all the latest breaking news, videos, and best stories from every
source, all in one place, expertly culled and edited, 24/7.
The Page
White House Photo Blog
Get an intimate look at the Bush administration and race for 2008 through the eyes of TIME's White House photographers.
White House Photo Blog
Ana Marie Cox on the trail
Keep up with Cox as she posts pictures and tidbits from the campaign trail.
Flickr
Twittr

Reader Comments (43)
Well, Jay...this is just the next step of Bush's "Faith Based Initiatives," which are a way to give street money to churches to pump up base turnout. Not that these inititatives can't do good things, but helping the poor wasn't why Bush wanted to do them.
7 years later, you're shocked that Bush is exploiting the Pope's visit?
Well, better late than never, Jay.
Posted by RKA
|
April 16, 2008 1:02 PM
Interesting post Mr. Jay Carney. But do you think Catholics are really that shallow that they'd vote for the Republicans just because Bush put out a nice spread for the Pope? Tweety, maybe. But not the rest of us.
Posted by Cookie Puss
|
April 16, 2008 1:03 PM
Maybe Bush just digs the concept of holding the Primary infallible.
Posted by SpotWeld | April 16, 2008 1:08 PM
Shortly after Bush’s 2001 inauguration:
Posted by J.J.
|
April 16, 2008 1:11 PM
I appreciate the post, Jay.
Unfortunately, most of the stenographers from the media will simply regurgitate what the White House tells them.
Posted by McCain Fluffer | April 16, 2008 1:13 PM
Funny how reporters are so turned off by the president being a gracious host to the pope but don't seem to mind when Jimmy Carter consults with terrorist organizations.
Posted by mr albany | April 16, 2008 1:15 PM
I'm impressed. I didn't know you could be a Protestant Evangelical Bible-Thumper and a Papist running dog. But Bush has pulled it off.
Posted by Cliff | April 16, 2008 1:17 PM
Okay Mr. Albany... who is the Catholic church at war with that Pres. Bush is attempting to broker negotiations with?
Posted by SpotWeld | April 16, 2008 1:17 PM
GOod post.
Embrace the cynicism, Jay, it's a valuable attribute in your profession.
Now apply some of it to McCain, SVP?
Posted by fedupwithswampland | April 16, 2008 1:21 PM
Jay, one of your best ever posts.
Posted by Southern Bell | April 16, 2008 1:26 PM
How is this a good post? What the hell does this have to do with anything?
I think I remember a little something in the constitution about a separation of church and state. I also think I remember a few stories over the past few years about priests molesting children. I also believe that Pope Benedict was a Nazi.
Religion is a way to control people. You are just allowing it to happen by giving any credit to this story.
Posted by lsumarkb | April 16, 2008 1:26 PM
Sweet Allah forbid we assume anything of merit about 43 beyond what they spew on Boston Legal as lefty loon "facts".
Posted by QUESTION HILLARY
|
April 16, 2008 1:26 PM
So if this is purely political why is the TradMed doing Bush's, and in effect McBush's, job for him? Can you answer that one, Jay? Are you indeed confirming that you guys are McBush's base?
Posted by Joe Klein's guilty conscience
|
April 16, 2008 1:29 PM
Jay is calling out Bush for his political use of religion.
If I ran the world, politicians would only be allowed to bring up their faith in the kind of forum attended by both Obama and HRC last Sunday, where the two were asked tough questions.
It turns my stomach when some public official just says "Trust me, I'm a Christian".
Posted by Southern Bell | April 16, 2008 1:29 PM
What this nation really needs IS Jihad Joe Klein, Skippy O'Bonger, Linda Horsewhips Thomason, and Bruce Springstuck telling actual Americans how to conduct foreign policy and international defense.
Then make Jiminy Crater the Special U.N. General Secretary for the Involuntary Immolation of Israel.
I'm just quoting Reverend Wrong here.
= MASS ABORTIONS ACCOMPLISHED =
Posted by QUESTION HILLARY
|
April 16, 2008 1:34 PM
and let's not forget pope razzi's butting in during the 2004 election -- advising to deny communion to catholic politicians (john kerry) who support abortion rights.
you can bet a similar message is going out this trip.
Posted by linda666 | April 16, 2008 1:35 PM
It turns my stomach when some public official just says "Trust me, I'm a Christian".
...
REVEREND WRONG HAS LEFT THE TAX BREAK.
Posted by QUESTION HILLARY
|
April 16, 2008 1:36 PM
lsumarkb - You wrote: "I think I remember a little something in the constitution about a separation of church and state."
Conservatives do not believe that a separation between church and state exists. The concept of separation is one of the most liberal aspects of our Constitution because it liberated us from the potential tyranny of organized religion.
The energetic response that you see from Jay Carney is due to the fact that he does not believe that his Republican Party would behave in such a way. The problem for Jay Carney is that he is a Republican that is in deep denial about what his party has become over these past few decades.
If only there were somebody on this board who could demonstrate for him precisely what the Republican Party stands for...
Cue QuestionHillary...
Posted by Terrapinion | April 16, 2008 1:44 PM
Thanks, Jay.
Damn you make sense sometimes.
Posted by TomT | April 16, 2008 1:44 PM
Understatement of the century.
Neither leader expressly mentioned areas -- the death penalty, the war in Iraq, and harsh CIA interrogation methods -- in which the Bush administration and the Vatican do not see eye to eye.
Posted by Paul Dirks
|
April 16, 2008 1:45 PM
Jay says: "I have no doubt that Pope Benedict XVI is a wise and decent man and a compelling spiritual leader."
Uh, why don't you have any doubts about the guy? He hasn't been Pope long enough to how whether or not he's wise or decent or a compelling spiritual leader.
Posted by Mike M. | April 16, 2008 1:54 PM
Jay-
I appreciate your cynicism regarding your compadres in the media. A question: What would happen to you if you expressed such cynicism in one of your television appearances? Do you fear that you would not be invited back?
Posted by smedley | April 16, 2008 2:09 PM
The other thing I found bizarre about the day's activity schedule was that they were going to have a lunch at the White House in the Pope's honor, but the Pope wasn't going to be there. Huh?
Posted by ivb | April 16, 2008 2:13 PM
"There's no question that the president's faith is real, that it's authentic, that it's genuine, and there's no question that it's calculated . . . George [W.] Bush doesn't know when he's operating out of a genuine sense of his own faith, or when it's calculated . . ."
-- Doug Wead, George H.W. Bush 1988 campaign religion adviser
Posted by penalcolony | April 16, 2008 2:15 PM
"I have no doubt that Pope Benedict XVI is a wise and decent man and a compelling spiritual leader."
Based on what? Your personal love, friendship and special bond with the Pope? Or based on his work as Cardinal to hide the facts of the Church's child abuse scandal?
Excuse me while I cringe, groan and gag...
Posted by Steve in Sacto
|
April 16, 2008 2:18 PM
Hear, hear.
I think McCain made a big mistake seeking out the Hagee endorsement and not more clearly repudiating his anti-Catholic views. On the one hand McCain appeared to reject them saying "[w]e've had a dignified campaign, and I repudiate any comments that are made, including Pastor Hagee's, if they are anti-Catholic or offensive to Catholics". But on the other hand, he hedged saying "I will say that he [Hagee] said that his words were taken out of context, he defends his position." Remember, we're talking about a guy who blamed the Holocaust on the Catholics. (Hagee also has some shall we say colorful views about other groups too.)
Source:
http://mediamatters.org/items/200803230004?f=h_latest
Posted by Crust
|
April 16, 2008 2:18 PM
The other thing I found bizarre about the day's activity schedule was that they were going to have a lunch at the White House in the Pope's honor, but the Pope wasn't going to be there.
He'll be there in spirit.
Posted by TomT | April 16, 2008 2:23 PM
"The problem for Jay Carney is that he is a Republican that is in deep denial about what his party has become over these past few decades."
I don't know if Jay 'the US Atty scandal doesn't exist' Carney is a Republican, but he is Washington bureau chief of a center-right periodical, which he essentially admitted Time was at YKOS.
Posted by Cincinnatus | April 16, 2008 2:27 PM
. And I think it's an important and wonderful thing when the Pope visits the United States, meets with the President and performs mass in America. It's a big deal.
Why?
I was raised Catholic, and I can see why it's an event for Catholics and the media when the pope comes to town. I can see why the president would meet with him. But why is it "wonderful"? If you're not Catholic, who cares where and if this person says mass?
Posted by Jim, Foolish Literalist | April 16, 2008 2:27 PM
"The other thing I found bizarre about the day's activity schedule was that they were going to have a lunch at the White House in the Pope's honor, but the Pope wasn't going to be there. Huh?"
My inside sources (anonymous, of course) tell me that the Pope hates hot dogs.
Posted by Enceladus | April 16, 2008 2:42 PM
I wonder if the Pope reminded Bush that their God does not like killing.
Posted by BMB | April 16, 2008 2:46 PM
" If you're not Catholic, who cares where and if this person says mass?"
If you're not Catholic, you might be wondering why the Pope isn't arrested for conspiracy to cover up massive number of cases of child rape.
I am a practicing Catholic, and I'd like to see the guy locked up. Apparently so does every other Catholic because I just learned we all behave and vote the same way, ( and we're swingers, at least with our votes.)
Posted by An Outhouse | April 16, 2008 2:48 PM
"The coming election, like so many before it, could well hinge on how Catholics break -- this time in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado and New Mexico."
So why are Mike Allen and Ed Henry acting like Republican enablers?
Posted by Independent | April 16, 2008 3:00 PM
If I was the pope, I'd worry that Bush would bring my numbers down.
Posted by Acid J | April 16, 2008 3:03 PM
Acid J wins the thread.
Posted by Cookie Puss
|
April 16, 2008 3:04 PM
Meh. Not feeling it. Meetings with heads of state are always filled with hyperbole. Chumming it up with the Pope is just as potentially dangerous politically as it would be helpful. I think this post is a miss.
But it's a good reminder to us of where we stand today -- every single act of a politician can be, and usually is, scrutinized up and down to try to figure out the real meaning underneath. And more often than not it's our own prejudices that color how we interpret those acts. So the decision we make about what a pol is "really" doing tends to say far more about us than about them, and therefore adds little or no value to the debate. It's the perennial trap that journalists -- and thinking people in general -- need always to keep in mind, and avoid if they can.
Posted by Harry | April 16, 2008 3:08 PM
Jay, Thank you! I don't mind your giving the benefit of the doubt to the relatively new Pope. After all, the last 2 Popes have been opposed to bush's warmongering, & many have been against capital punishment. But it is great to see you calling out the MSM for their submission to bush's lies. It was also helpful to have you name the syncophants. We know it is everyone @ Faux, but the more of these stenographers that get publically named/shamed, the better.
Posted by tom | April 16, 2008 3:24 PM
Keep digging, Jay. I'm sure that you'll find that Bush "looked into the Pope's heart" at some point and found a man he could deal with. Wait. That was that other guy...
AcidJ: COTD
Posted by kbanginmotown | April 16, 2008 3:29 PM
"Religious" leaders telling the Bushes what to do with their time is not that unusual. In the mid 90's when the Unification Church was being found guilty by the highest courts in Japan of swindling hundreds of millions from widows - when the UC was getting its richly deserved bad press, Poppy came to Japan to help the number one money of the right the last 25 year with his image problem there. People in one town bowed to Moon because he could tell a President of the USA what to do with his time.
This is how Moon aid, Bo Hi Pak, described it in his book:
http://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/Tims2/Tims2-60.htm
New York, New York - January 2, 1996
Posted by Bonnie2 | April 16, 2008 4:18 PM
http://tinyurl.com/4uaesa
The U.S. Justice Department has told a Texas court that a lawsuit accusing Pope Benedict XVI of conspiring to cover up the sexual molestation of three boys by a seminarian should be dismissed because the pontiff enjoys immunity as head of state of the Holy See.
Posted by Bonnie2 | April 16, 2008 4:33 PM
Keep digging, Jay. I'm sure that you'll find that Bush "looked into the Pope's heart" at some point and found a man he could deal with. Wait. That was that other guy...
Ga see this?
From the WP Glenn Kessler c-span interview
http://www.btcnews.com/btcnews/1752
[A]t his very first meeting with Putin, Putin told [Bush] a story about a cross that he had blessed in Israel that used to belong to his grandmother. People that are aware of this conversation at the State Department feel that the President got played by Putin. There is no cross. There was just some KGB story that he made up. But it had a real impact on President Bush. That’s when he walked out and said, ‘I looked into his soul and decided this is the guy I can work with.’ And for the longest time in the first term, if you talked to then National Security Adviser Rice, she always painted the relationship with Russia in very rosy terms. …”
Posted by Bonnie2 | April 16, 2008 4:39 PM
"But hyping the relationship ... is pure political exploitation. The Pope is no doubt aware of this, but he is blameless in his complicity."
You misspelled "shameless". The Pope is shameless in his complicity.
Posted by ZenoMachino | April 16, 2008 6:49 PM
So why didn't chickengeorge's bestest buddy not want to have dinner with him?
Posted by merl | April 17, 2008 2:19 AM