Wednesday, December 19, 2007 at 10:51 am
We're Shocked! Shocked!
You mean to tell us that White House lawyers, led by then-counsel Alberto Gonzales, and including Dick Cheney's legal enabler, David Addington, played a bigger role in the CIA torture tapes episode than the administration has acknowledged? No way!!
UPDATE: After objections from the White House, the New York Times has corrected the subhead to its story. The subhead -- "White House Role Was Wider Than It Said" -- suggests that the "White House" had officially commented about the destruction of the CIA interrogation tapes, comments that turned out to be misleading. In fact, the White House has never officially commented on the issue. But administration officials have, on background. The distinction is real, since "It" - the White House -- never described its role. And so the Times is correcting the subhead. But the Times is standing by the story itself, which says "the involvement of White House officials in the discussions before the destruction of the tapes in November 2005 was more extensive than Bush administration officials have acknowledged."
About Swampland
Recent Posts
Swampland - TIME.com Archives
RSS Feed
Daily Email
More TIME Blogs
Top Stories
- Obama Gets Ready for His Washington Closeup
- Despite Pummeling in Gaza, Hamas Thinks It Has the Upper Hand
- America's Untapped Energy Resource: Boosting Efficiency
- Auto Sales Dive in December: Near-Term Outlook Remains Grim
- Leon Panetta: An Intel Outsider the CIA Needs
- Popping Smart Pills: the Case for Cognitive Enhancement
- Lessons From The Great Depression
- Gaza Ground War: Day One
- Have Americans Gone Nuts Over Nut Allergies?
- Russia and Ukraine's Annual Gas Spat
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.