Friday, December 28, 2007 at 6:10 pm
More Polarizing Than Nixon? Please.
Peggy Noonan writes beautifully, and quite often sensibly. Most of her latest column fits that description perfectly. But not this bit of feverish hyperbole:
Mrs. Clinton is the most dramatically polarizing, the most instinctively distrusted, political figure of my lifetime. Yes, I include Nixon.
That is simply an absurd statement. Is Hillary Clinton polarizing? Yes, as every poll we've ever seen on her has shown. But it's ridiculous to suggest that she's more so than Nixon -- or, for that matter, than George W. Bush, or Bill Clinton, or even Noonan's beloved Ronald Reagan. No politician should earn the "most polarizing ever" -- or "greatest ever" -- designation without having sat behind the desk in the Oval Office. No one can polarize, or earn history's praise, on the scale that a president can. Even among non-presidents, is Hillary more polarizing than Jesse Jackson? Pat Buchanan? Pat Robertson? Al Sharpton? I don't think so.
About Swampland
Recent Posts
Swampland - TIME.com Archives
RSS Feed
Daily Email
More TIME Blogs
Top Stories
- The Swearing-In Circus Comes to Capitol Hill
- Despite Pummeling in Gaza, Hamas Thinks It Has the Upper Hand
- America's Untapped Energy Resource: Boosting Efficiency
- Auto Sales Dive in December: Near-Term Outlook Remains Grim
- Leon Panetta: An Intel Outsider the CIA Needs
- Popping Smart Pills: the Case for Cognitive Enhancement
- Lessons From The Great Depression
- Bailout Report Card: How Successful Have the Rescue Efforts Been?
- Another Gitmo Grows in Afghanistan
- Iranian Resistance Group a Source of Contention in Iraq
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.