December 31, 2007 3:14
Huckabust
Des Moines
Just when you think the Republican presidential race can't get weirder...Mike Huckabee holds a press conference here to announce that he'd just made a last minute decision not to air a negative TV ad slamming Romney.
And then he airs the ad (Video courtesy of Mark Halperin who was setting in the row behund me). For the press corps--a gazillion cameras, nearly a hundred reporters, certainly more than Huckabee has ever seen in one place in his life. No doubt, you'll be seeing a lot of this ad--just like you saw a lot of first Swiftboard ad in 2004, which aired only a few times, but was repeatedly constantly--for free-on Fox News. When asked about the transparent cynicism of this ploy, Huckabee said, "Well, you can be cynical about this...but if we hadn't shown the ad, you would have said we didn't make it."
I don't think so. Not with all those monster oppo "Enough is Enough" charts surrounding Huckabee with facts and figures about Romney's alleged depravities--on taxes, abortion, immigration, guns and judicial appointments. (Huckabee's partially-birthed ad slags Romney for, among other things, offering a $50 co-pay for abortions in Massachusetts.)
That sound you hear rumbling out of Des Moines appears to be a monumental implosion.
About Swampland
Ana Marie Cox, Washington Editor of Time.com, is the founding editor of Wonkette and the author of the novel Dog Days. Read more
Joe Klein is TIME's political columnist and author of six books, most recently Politics Lost. Read more
Karen Tumulty is TIME's National Political Correspondent and has also covered the White House and Congress. Read more
Jay Carney is TIME's Washington bureau chief. He has covered the Clinton and Bush 43 White Houses as well as Congress. Read more
Jay Newton-Small has covered the Bush 43 White House and Congress since the DeLay era. Read more
Michael Scherer is a TIME Washington bureau correspondent covering the 2008 presidential campaign. Read more
RSS Feed
Daily Email
CNN Politics
Get U.S. and global politics 24-7. Politics at CNN has campaign coverage, latest headlines and video, candidates' positions on the issues, fundraising totals, states to watch, delegate counts, election results, news and analysis
CNN Politics
The Page
Mark Halperin and the TIME political team covering the 2008 campaign bring you all the latest breaking news, videos, and best stories from every
source, all in one place, expertly culled and edited, 24/7.
The Page
White House Photo Blog
Get an intimate look at the Bush administration and race for 2008 through the eyes of TIME's White House photographers.
White House Photo Blog
Ana Marie Cox on the trail
Keep up with Cox as she posts pictures and tidbits from the campaign trail.
Flickr
Twittr

Reader Comments (20)
Swiftboard ad
I take it this is the one in which a CIA officer claims that it took only 35 seconds for Abu Zubaydah to save American lives.
Posted by Acid J | December 31, 2007 3:49 PM
What perfect timing!
I was looking for an example of the hypocritical nature of Evangelical 'values'.
Frankly, I think I deserve credit for not calling Huckabee a cynical, morally bankrupt politician. I am far too good a person to sink to the level of such name-calling.
Posted by Terrapinion | December 31, 2007 4:02 PM
Who do you think is behind the fake Romney Christmas card dirty trick in South Carolina?
Posted by Crust
|
December 31, 2007 4:09 PM
Joe still doesn't understand the Huckabee dynamic.
His base consists of true believers -- people who will praise Huckabee for not responding to attacks because he is following the biblical command to "turn the other cheek", and will praise him for responding to an attack at because he is acting on the "eye for an eye" bible verses.
These are people who think its a good idea to make homosexuality illegal in order to save souls, but who also think its a good idea to cut taxes on the rich despite the fact that the odds of a wealthy persons getting into heaven are the same as those of a camel passing through the eyes of a needle.
In other words, once someone has 'prayed over' their decision to support Huckabee, they aren't changing their minds.
Posted by joeksux | December 31, 2007 4:16 PM
Oh, cmon...this is just like when Hillary sends out Shaheen and Kerrey to say their pieces and then backtrack once its out there.
It's called Nixonian plausible deniability.
And it seems to be very popular with politicians from Arkansas.
Posted by RKA | December 31, 2007 4:51 PM
Folksy Implosion, if you will.
Posted by AJ | December 31, 2007 5:13 PM
but if we hadn't shown the ad, you would have said we didn't make it."
It actually makes sense in a perverse sort of way. Needless to say I'm not surprised.
Posted by Paul Dirks
|
December 31, 2007 5:15 PM
for those of us who won't be voting republican, it's hard to decide which candidate is worse: huckabee or romney.
as bad as huckabee is, i think romney is much more dangerous. his positions on executive hepower and the constituion are abhorrent. romney is also a habitual liar and a charlatan.
huckabee is grossly misguided and poorly informed, but at least he's being himself, something romney couldn't do if his life depended on it.
Posted by Dave | December 31, 2007 5:52 PM
I wonder what would have happened if a candidate the Villagers feel more comfortable with had pulled a similar stunt. Would the reaction have been the same? I bet if McCain had pulled this particular stunt, the press would be praising him for how cleverly he slipped this one in there.
Posted by Florida | December 31, 2007 5:58 PM
You should have used this post as an opportunity to tell us how much of a loser John Edwards is. He's raised pretty good money today and I think another Joe Klein/Washington insider attack could really top off the day for him
Posted by flounder | December 31, 2007 6:07 PM
No offense, Joe, but this seems like *exactly* the sort of thing the voters won't give a sh*t about, and 95% probably won't even hear about.
I don't doubt that the press were laughing their heads off (justifiably), but this seems hardly the sort of thing to cause a campaign implosion -- unless of course it's flogged on the air relentlessly for the next 48 hrs a la the "dean scream."
Posted by slow | December 31, 2007 6:10 PM
Hi Joey,
What's Pete Hoekstra's take on all this?
You think Rush and Ann Coulter will be upset and turn on Huckabee despite his role in letting a serial rapist get another turn at bat?
What's on for New Year's Eve this year. You guys getting together and Ben and Sally's? I understand Dean Broder makes the New Year's toast over there about not letting any more white trash destory the house of Reagan and Bush.
Or is at Andrea and Al's again? I understand Judy and Al are going to try to make it to both places.
Posted by Wanderer | December 31, 2007 6:11 PM
One hopes that the Huckabee campaign will counter Romney attacks by pointing out how he used offshore corporations to avoid U.S. taxation, and fee-milked acquired businesses before firing workers and taking them into bankruptcy, to amass his great $250,000,000 wealth. (I have heard nothing about this until I discovered it quite by accident this evening.)
So, when you compare how Mr. Huckabee's visionary FairTax advocacy compares to Romney's interest in the current tax system, it's pretty easy to see who will lead us out of tax slavery - the $265 billion annual tax code compliance costs representing 5 billion wasted hours, annually.
Posted by Ian
|
December 31, 2007 8:20 PM
Joey,
When do the latest Republican talking points come out?
Does Grover discuss them at New Year's Eve? Or do you get them from Rush and Ann after they recover?
I understand the thought is to try to make Bush a combination of Harry Truman, Winston Churchill and Joe DiMaggio. If anyone can pull that off, it is you guys in DC.
Also, Joey, when you get a chance, can you regale us with the latest Al Bore jokes from Pete Hoekstra.
I know you are too busy to discern the difference between truth and lies -- deadlines are deadlines -- but I understand you are up for the Steno Sue award for 2007. Best of luck, old boy.
Posted by Wanderer | December 31, 2007 9:21 PM
"Huckabee said, "Well, you can be cynical about this...but if we hadn't shown the ad, you would have said we didn't make it." '
...And if you're trying to show that your the sweet and kind sort of person who doesn't run negative campaign ads, why would you want to go out of your way to let the press know that you'd made such an ad?
It's a bit worrying that he doesn't even know how a decent person thinks.
Posted by Savagemouse | December 31, 2007 11:17 PM
On January 4th Ed Rollins "resigns" to spend more time wearing his Friday night yarmulke in his wife's luxury apartment.
Five days later he tells Chris Matthews (as who else is gonna listen to him?) that if Huckabee had implants he'd be Katherine Harris.
Posted by JF | January 1, 2008 8:09 AM
Joe and the reporters (notice I didn't say "other" reporters) are mightily annoyed because Huckabee thought they were stupid.
Since the vast majority of journalists haven't been doing their jobs since September 11, 2001, why are the reporters surprised?
Posted by kmblue | January 1, 2008 10:10 AM
"appears to be a monumental implosion"
Precient as ever Joe. Huck imploded into a landslide in Iowa.
Posted by ignatov | January 4, 2008 2:06 PM
About that rumbling. . . "implosion"? That's what it may have 'appeared' to be; but other senses identify it as punditry flatulence. A bipartisan phenomena.
Posted by Robert McGuigan | January 4, 2008 6:45 PM
Dear Time:
The implosion was all Joe's (again). When are you going to realize how out-of-touch, insider spoon-fed, and completely lacking in original thought this guy is? Get someone who has some principles and thinks for himself.
Posted by chaz44 | January 5, 2008 11:26 AM